From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Is this a bug in my code or the compiler?
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 15:56:16 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <lyoakhhvfz.fsf@pushface.org>
References: <4f4cd4b1-0a6d-441b-a4f7-98add70e4e1e@googlegroups.com>
 <1p71vf5ckbudu$.1qcb9ot1jpysk.dlg@40tude.net>
 <mlf4j0$slg$1@dont-email.me>
 <1g33axhwakrzx.o6t14iz4jruy.dlg@40tude.net>
 <mlgv5n$hqp$1@dont-email.me>
 <12d47zawbqsu2$.fba3cmxkkrq1.dlg@40tude.net>
 <mlm9r4$gl9$1@dont-email.me>
 <16cwc4uk0raxi.iinfpkn9sqid$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <lysi9ti256.fsf@pushface.org>
 <5hn9aewmwxqo$.18v0zxdvy9ovz.dlg@40tude.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="2c7d8f71a176d2eaa78ec9fbd86e1d4a";
 logging-data="10702"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
 posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18XOG6UQu8S5bqoBoHYApVLEYXB5BYlve4="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:1ZpJ03Qdm8aGcjIOmF8ZTAqZy6I=
 sha1:NwKbGMLKG1KvvPV4VA5hxDPTxAk=
Xref: number.nntp.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:193636
Date: 2015-06-15T15:56:16+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> writes:

> On Mon, 15 Jun 2015 13:31:33 +0100, Simon Wright wrote:
>
>> "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> writes:
>> 
>>>    "+" (Right #> Y, Left #> X);
>>>
>>> #> reads evaluated left-to-right.
>> 
>>    "+" (Right => Y and then Left => X);
>> 
>> maybe.
>
> "and then" could be ambiguous.

?

>> And you could even put it on the spec.
>
> You mean:
>
>    function "+" (Left : T and then Right : T) return T;
>
> ?

Yes, I guess, but it's not going to happen!