From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Private extension of a synchronized interface Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 13:46:28 +0000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="988bbdb55a47696c23c5f89fe2b4ab0d"; logging-data="28741"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/d5pMf6HrnQBRcFO6c09nvxbM4iOtDYaI=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:C+BTtbrRgTNerH4y9wz1aiJW1wY= sha1:N8+VzITzozECHpRQlepxzJnNAOE= Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:55602 Date: 2019-02-20T13:46:28+00:00 List-Id: "Randy Brukardt" writes: > What I'd suggest in this case is to create a self-testing example as a > potential ACATS test. I'd guess that a case like this doesn't happen > in the ACATS, but this a fundemental enough capabilitity that is makes > sense for an example to be in the test suite. The only C test occurences of 'synchronized' are in c950001 and c954027; both use class-wide objects or accesses.