From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Exception traceback when using TDM-GCC 5.1.0-3 Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2016 10:44:30 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <3e02dbb0-69e3-429b-b8c5-d4762dbeb187@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="1cb8779fb08c1b31c8309afcb9b531dc"; logging-data="26839"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19ttZoAvDY+3he6ChjPzems9PhxCL4kW10=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Eqlu2UPrQ2soyDjrYRHUsr0wtKM= sha1:UpO7OQlPCSKepIObQy2q2MB1jio= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:31141 Date: 2016-07-24T10:44:30+01:00 List-Id: ahlan.marriott@gmail.com writes: > The Call stack traceback locations are what I was expecting but > unfortunately are missing when I raise an exception. > So the question is why. > Do you compile or build with different switches than me? >gnatmake -g -f ce.adb -bargs -E (-f only to force the recompilation) No idea why ...