From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Trigonometric operations on x86 and x64 CPUs Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 08:37:16 +0000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <8d0f7f03-9324-4702-9100-d6b8a1f16fc5@googlegroups.com> <18af86db-21fd-4fa0-90a3-c87b6486b439@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="e9e66d3d8a2a2119342f75dfb01d0d59"; logging-data="19082"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18vMn7WHAHwC6qW3sFe2K9JUkHjZMKV9AI=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:z/840rZG4UGlDTxNobanCqo8OTA= sha1:yA+x8zrxZ+s+RmFrl1e1z1p/0Po= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:32921 Date: 2016-12-20T08:37:16+00:00 List-Id: Niklas Holsti writes: > On 16-12-20 01:49 , already5chosen@yahoo.com wrote: >> On Tuesday, December 20, 2016 at 1:11:26 AM UTC+2, Randy Brukardt wrote: >>> ... >>> There's also the little matter of meeting the Ada language >>> requirements. The people who put accuracy requirements on Ada >>> numeric libraries might have been "sensationalists"", but those of >>> us implementing Ada have to abide by those requirements. >> >> Unfortunately, I don't know where to look for Ada language >> requirement. Can you tell me what are requirements for sin/cos in >> Ada numeric library? > > RM section G.2.4, Accuracy Requirements for the Elementary Functions. http://www.ada-auth.org/standards/rm12_w_tc1/html/RM-G-2-4.html