From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Newcomers to comp.lang.ada: welcome and how did you end up here ? Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 14:31:54 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <87h9zdpi84.fsf@ixod.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="865ecc8333c04b7dc8d5f87fc772110b"; logging-data="13014"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18r1XKscYDffNAYAPRdy3cXORnDwvQxHCo=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:CvcHSAc3KOdaKebSUK4YRhBOQ8Y= sha1:3CdxACl6sLMSKwDf0TKNRURwPKE= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:22280 Date: 2014-10-09T14:31:54+01:00 List-Id: Mark Carroll writes: > Ada does look good but, as far as I can tell, if I ever want to use it > for any software not to be distributed under the GPL, I'm faced with > dealing with a subscription model (with goodness knows what guarantees > of ongoing affordability) negotiated with a private corporation, so > personally I'll probably actually not invest any more time into > learning about Ada and disappear from here and use something else for > my projects. If you were to negotiate with AdaCore, you'd find that you are entitled to continue to use the version(s) you obtained while you were supported indefinitely (even after the support contract expires). If you are prepared to use the FSF GCC unsupported (except by the goodwill of folk here, on Stack Overflow, and on IRC somewhere), and you can get hold of a build with Ada enabled (Debian Linux (easy), probably other Linux distributions, Mac OS X, ...) then you can develop code and release binaries under any licence that you want: see GCC Runtime Library Exception[1], Rationale document and Frequently Asked Questions[2]. [1] http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gcc-exception.html [2] http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gcc-exception-faq.html