From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Use of expression function in protected type Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 22:34:53 +0000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="8878eaae66d49f7d529ec3c7abf78fb7"; logging-data="25041"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+6cDuI8TCmzVu2ia4OJta8UUjfrHwYcxM=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:2QCKFehcEas+802C7+RapxqrQ2g= sha1:t5ysGy2qnHHEZc3eSnf9FnyOBu4= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:24651 Date: 2015-01-20T22:34:53+00:00 List-Id: Is it permissible to use an expression function as the completion of a protected function? (GNAT thinks so). protected Button is function Current_Index return Interval_Index; private Index : Interval_Index := 0; procedure Handler; pragma Attach_Handler (Handler, Ada.Interrupts.Names.EXTI0_IRQ); end Button; and then protected body Button is function Current_Index return Interval_Index is (Index); -- <<<<<<<< procedure Handler is begin HAL_GPIO_EXTI_IRQHandler (16#0001#); Index := Index + 1; end Handler; end Button; ARM 6.1(30) distinguishes an expression_function_declaration from a subprogram_declaration. 6.8(4) allows an expression_function_declaration to be a completion. 9.4(8) says a protected_operation_item can be, inter alia, a subprogram_declaration or a subprogram body. (subprogram_declaration? how can that be?)