From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Advice, tasking and hardware Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 19:00:00 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <25c43463-47ca-4021-82ee-299e6a075faa@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="fa27e9c62dd412c1b6adffaac11b940a"; logging-data="9998"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18dyjhWCRnvRiVtQUnT17iluVSEUuUIkU4=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:u98KB8PGTbsmthNirTxNi4GkcK0= sha1:Yhbrl6+DRIf92P5oWgUcbUzAfXE= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:30492 Date: 2016-05-27T19:00:00+01:00 List-Id: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" writes: > The rule of thumb is that if all requests are done synchronously to > the caller, no task is used, only a protected interlocking object > is. The entry of the protected object serves as a queue. I think Ravenscar was mentioned? if using an RTS which only supports Ravenscar, you can't have entry queues. I'm not sure whether you can mix Ravenscar and unrestricted profiles within the same partition using the full RTS?