From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Precisely why can't official FSF GNAT maintainers copy bug fixes
 in GNAT & its GCC-contained runtime en masse from GNAT GPL Community Edition?
Date: Fri, 04 May 2018 22:46:59 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <lyk1sjytyk.fsf@pushface.org>
References: <9c3a75d6-a01f-4cfa-9493-10b8b082ead8@googlegroups.com>
	<114db2c4-1e8c-4506-8d7c-df955dd9f808@googlegroups.com>
	<87d0yc1lsq.fsf@nightsong.com>
	<a181b4df-ceec-4d3e-8669-19ee8f268e56@googlegroups.com>
	<878t901jp4.fsf@nightsong.com>
	<bb2cbfdf-abb3-4b59-9ded-ce27bb98144b@googlegroups.com>
	<pcidmv$h2d$1@z-news.wcss.wroc.pl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="25c73b1301d872a4ef34651acedb48a8";
	logging-data="8841"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/61ZF+EgenycJLv69jBsCR31cohDgJ09o="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:rWmBk4AdIQ/GtLargydsrOprYbI=
	sha1:tsYxuscjIvMZif7GvaQyo/QIGeU=
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:51989
Date: 2018-05-04T22:46:59+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

antispam@math.uni.wroc.pl writes:

>  Do not be fooled by copyright statements
> in files: copyright exists even if there is no explicit
> statement in files.  And changing copyright notices is
> extra work (and it interrupts normal software workflow)
> so Ada Core used to have wrong copyright notices.
> Robert Dewar (who IIUC has law degree) claimed that
> copyright notices does not matter

He did indeed; but FSF statements on how to put your contribution under
GPL say to put the notice in all files.

>    I guess that they decided to give misleading
> statement about ownership as this does not cause
> serious problems.

What misleading statement?

> Concerning FSF, I think that they know what Ada Core
> is doing and accept that.  I personaly think that
> Ada Core is subverting GPL, but apparently FSF
> either thinks that what Ada Core is doing is right or
> decided to compromise to have a contributor.

Many FSF offerings have similar notices; including C library, C++
library, Bison

> Note that without paying customers Ada Core would
> get out of business and Ada Core thinks that
> it needs licence restrictions to get enough money.

People who are developing multimillion's worth of software can usually
be persuaded to buy support for it.

>            (adapting GNAT to GCC backend is
> a continuous effort that would put significant
> load on volunteer maintainers).

Well, that's certainly true.