From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada needs Qt(5) bindings
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 13:50:49 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <lyip0iwpcm.fsf@pushface.org>
References: <20130709201738.1609dce5@atmarama.noip.me>
	<lyzjtvwljj.fsf@pushface.org>
	<20130710074954.317716cc@atmarama.noip.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="c8504a89c76ea11bda6664e6198ae3cd";
	logging-data="31513"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/a8zNvBGNSTa4+t/yCHT/Nhuyc9DcdIpE="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ub77RPBBcRgQYhuf2PROCTDs4p4=
	sha1:QqhuDmpCTRh83F25x0S+5j6Ncts=
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:16263
Date: 2013-07-10T13:50:49+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Gour <gour@atmarama.net> writes:

> On Tue, 09 Jul 2013 21:00:48 +0100
> Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org> wrote:
>
>> This approach has always seemed a possibility to me. The problem I
>> found with the equivalent in Tcl/Tk was that there seemed to be no
>> way of making a callback from the Ada to the Tcl.
>
> Maybe I wouldn't need callbacks, but still wonder how much would
> Python spoil type-safety of the whole app?

You'd need to validate the passed values on entry to the Ada part, just
as with any external input. I expect the same would apply to QtAda.