From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,39579ad87542da0e
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Received: by 10.66.221.42 with SMTP id qb10mr4877692pac.37.1368583930518;
        Tue, 14 May 2013 19:12:10 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 bp1ni2318pbd.1!nntp.google.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed.news.ucla.edu!nrc-news.nrc.ca!News.Dal.Ca!news.litech.org!news.stack.nl!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx05.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Seeking for papers about tagged types vs access to subprograms
Date: Sun, 12 May 2013 08:37:11 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <lyhai8ps2g.fsf@pushface.org>
References: <op.wv8jh1c1ule2fv@cardamome> <kmbohm$elb$1@loke.gir.dk>
	<p0pf97g5w6xg.jhca6ztjwpde$.dlg@40tude.net>
	<op.wwq9s4l6ule2fv@cardamome>
	<1bfhq7jo34xpi.p8n2vq6yjsea.dlg@40tude.net>
	<op.wwrefx1pule2fv@cardamome>
	<cps71yzogw24$.7ol98fxcaurj$.dlg@40tude.net>
	<op.wwriky0dule2fv@cardamome>
	<nd22gfeezrwf$.tlj4yyygrwq3$.dlg@40tude.net>
	<kmecg6$et4$1@loke.gir.dk>
	<12gn9wvv1gwfk.10ikfju4rzmnj.dlg@40tude.net>
	<kmh7d4$up3$1@loke.gir.dk>
	<1oy5rmprgawqs.1jz36okze0xju$.dlg@40tude.net>
	<kmk45u$v45$1@loke.gir.dk>
	<1q2ql1e4rcgko.diszzq1mhaq8$.dlg@40tude.net>
	<op.wwwtznpsule2fv@cardamome>
	<1msoad3apbkf.1optea1ujjydv.dlg@40tude.net>
	<wcc61ypi100.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
	<otnq8fecgbel.1itrfodtky6d0.dlg@40tude.net>
	<op.wwyj4vovule2fv@cardamome>
	<xrlivgfvo6vp.1w3qblmw5gfzr.dlg@40tude.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="720834a9e3ef3094259fa78805e56e66";
	logging-data="18679"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18eemAX/WBDCAj6pP3epz1RxCCgwyHSO3Q="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:x2rDjx1kXsgJtc2QpvitDJG9vQ4=
	sha1:Ee87HalAE231rOmlK8aJbLVWZ8A=
X-Received-Bytes: 2158
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: 2013-05-12T08:37:11+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> writes:

> To put it simply: if a type is designed in a way that limits it use,
> it is a poor design.

I think that depends on who is paying for all the extra work you would
be putting in.