From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: to Simon Wright, re Mac OS X builds
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2016 14:20:57 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <lyh98o1eiu.fsf@pushface.org>
References: <4a4cee95-52e4-42c6-b4bb-a8146744bafd@googlegroups.com>
	<lyint5zz7w.fsf@pushface.org>
	<b0c22f9e-738d-4492-b639-d277fa3cd7c5@googlegroups.com>
	<e5639c1a-14b0-43b1-9449-54da615b242b@googlegroups.com>
	<ly37k92zae.fsf@pushface.org>
	<9f2f108e-9f8d-4ba2-86ad-ca5baae7c771@googlegroups.com>
	<e70665e3-8115-4ec3-8397-a7f01d51c245@googlegroups.com>
	<lyy4211eig.fsf@pushface.org>
	<7d6e52e2-af45-4a9b-904f-be2504e3eb02@googlegroups.com>
	<00a5b373-109d-469f-a20c-ac1352313bb6@googlegroups.com>
	<lylgy01ux5.fsf@pushface.org>
	<869242276.497524703.386042.laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="97b731c393a3b6adeaffb0d6e8195bfd";
	logging-data="10274"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18SzzJA4Y7fHbn2oowjzAd+/kODJTYKDM0="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:VpcxHjkWg/PFhrokWZqM5LfEjzI=
	sha1:Kg/nZvsXAvvjZ03TS2/f7C7PLRg=
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:32034
Date: 2016-10-07T14:20:57+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Luke A. Guest <laguest@archeia.com> writes:

> Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org> wrote:

> How well does Ada bind to objc? I know the objc language just calls c
> functions in the objc runtime underneath.

Sorry, I just did as I was asked without knowing much at all about
objc. The last time I tried there were quite a lot of check failures.

>> Also, the configure flag --with-boot-ldflags supports relocation of
>> the built binary, and (together with the patch gcc-6.1.0.diff),
>> suppresses GCC PR 61027.
>
> I don't know anything about this.

If you can say "gnatchop --help" and not get a SEGV, you are OK