From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Recommendation of safe subset of Ada to use?
Date: Tue, 08 May 2018 09:07:30 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <lyh8nih8ot.fsf@pushface.org>
References: <9839db28-b6c6-44c9-9d36-336a39c12f25@googlegroups.com>
	<9a41b8a3-2ac9-4630-8028-2ba165b0fb0b@googlegroups.com>
	<pcmbmd$fee$1@dont-email.me>
	<5eec9be4-03ab-4cbc-8de5-0e9697228ab6@googlegroups.com>
	<31262263-1919-451d-bacd-663494df19fa@googlegroups.com>
	<6e66aa5f-9ce0-4f28-ae1b-9bdfeb500a79@googlegroups.com>
	<pcqqeh$4o3$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="652a30573e3bc65831a74472933ebafe";
	logging-data="12376"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/f9ZdrtWjh40OUqKqAPmFaac60iyyhSt8="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:YDS79BeBKT3Pel5f6unkYAhZFM4=
	sha1:1niT3LJWR77xtE6+ouxznarnCws=
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:52096
Date: 2018-05-08T09:07:30+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com> writes:

> Note that examples of this case were included in ACATS test B641002,
> including one that looks nearly identical to the OP's example. That
> was issued in March 2014, so it's quite possible for older compilers
> to not make the check. If a new compiler doesn't make the check,
> definitely complain to your vendor and tell 'em I sent you. :-)

GNAT GPL >= 2015, FSF GCC >= 5 all refuse to compile that test: 23
errors each of which is marked in the source as expected.