From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Question on speed of set operations
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 23:11:49 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <lyh8bl2s3u.fsf@pushface.org>
References: <b5bbc7b4-f685-4392-b8cd-b3f971c2b564@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="6ee5177569f3338e9ea443dfc4741840";
	logging-data="8530"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18UmRyrVgIT77A6jYhT6alyUbt+xdEACQo="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:OgkpIZllqsPBNCRuOgBr9kl5oB4=
	sha1:IpQL6zctM694Vmx/4NlgvCsHSUM=
Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:56013
Date: 2019-03-29T23:11:49+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

reinert <reinkor@gmail.com> writes:

> So what is the best alternative among the following tree procedures
> for the above purpose (in terms of *speed*):

If I were you I would do some benchmarking.