From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Fun with trampolines
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 18:03:25 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <lyfu52h6vm.fsf@pushface.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="1ae5433837d63f54672b7089c6c32bf7";
	logging-data="2842"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/6qX1z34NJlNlnDeVxtTPFMdxShVPidxg="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:9tXnMj1ZCgjYw53AlclXOcTKodg=
	sha1:DJFIUCmKQkdfGLOq0ncui/9iPAc=
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:50974
Date: 2018-03-14T18:03:25+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Some of you might be entertained by my recent encounter with trampolines
for Tcl/Tk callbacks. Always tiresome when you visit demo code after a
few years and it doesn't work any more.

There's at least a chance that the trampoline (which exists on the
stack) might have been trampled on, though I didn't think so when I
checked it. The question has to be, _which_ stack is it on? I suppose it
has to be that of the code that's executing when 'Access is taken.

https://forward-in-code.blogspot.co.uk/2018/03/tcltk-vs-trampolines.html