From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED.DFxaDADwSkn+6wW9Ah21PA.user.gioia.aioe.org!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: How do I resolve SPARK warning "procedure [...] has no effect for output procedure Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 15:36:42 +0000 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: <2cf70068-45e1-4e39-8ff4-3348f37e63fd@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: DFxaDADwSkn+6wW9Ah21PA.user.gioia.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:bmdAFTy4bi6qDaZd52jbEVVQrwM= X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2 Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:58255 Date: 2020-03-26T15:36:42+00:00 List-Id: digitig writes: > I specifically said I wanted to resolve it, not hide it ("Hopefully > better than `SPARK_mode => Off'"). It's not that uncommon in SPARK to have to annotate to explain why some apparent problem is not in fact so.