From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Reporting GNAT bugs Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 06:27:20 +0000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="e614caa3bbcdcdac946afd88f128a08d"; logging-data="25376"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/dkoUmrSOhLYGZGIdoLM0XRxA4PSzlhm4=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:qy9zdFB5Q0JDy+u9xKrBsMOpBuo= sha1:pIBucOkrovGe++3/nDBnBCASK6c= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:22890 Date: 2014-10-29T06:27:20+00:00 List-Id: Victor Porton writes: > Simon Wright wrote: > >> Victor Porton writes: >> >>> If I found a serious GNAT bug, is it enough to report it at >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ ? >>> >>> Or should I also ping someone so that the bug would not be lost and >>> fixed quickly? >> >> If the bug can be reproduced in GNAT GPL, send it to report@adacore.com >> (possibly as well as at the GCC bugzilla; that way the rest of us get to >> see it). > > gnat package in Debian Linux is not GNAT GPL? No, it isn't. > How much disk space installation of GNAT GPL will take? My disk space is > limited. About 150 MB. > Should I report them without checking with something other than the > standard Debian package? I certainly wouldn't.