From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Comparing Access Types Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2017 08:29:26 +0000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="ef8367995f18c1c455596827d69939c4"; logging-data="4636"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+ohqdYzcAIOJsA8R+dRIafCUW7QNh5FdI=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:4VMBQ8Gc0KpnJtIVVA3mAQCFuvY= sha1:5qi/0qBe2j7eb0iwO4e9rgUfFiQ= Xref: feeder.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:48778 Date: 2017-11-09T08:29:26+00:00 List-Id: Jere writes: > I have a package which uses a type to wrap an access type. I thought > it might be nice to provide the basic comparison functions, "=", "<", > ">", etc. but access types can only be compared using "=" and "/=". > I figured that way, my types could be used in some sort of sorted > container, like a map. I've used a hashed container.