From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,3a6337228af80b02 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Received: by 10.180.75.8 with SMTP id y8mr2211141wiv.1.1361101630002; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 03:47:10 -0800 (PST) Path: g1ni16318wig.0!nntp.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx05.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Question: What's the difference between pools of pools and Ada 2012's new subpools? Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 11:47:11 +0000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <8fe47d10-1889-43e7-be85-510ece95c1a6@googlegroups.com> <1f5hzkoyu135m.8modyeyr3mtp$.dlg@40tude.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="0a6ca0935c728e617c1a2d4bdcfc6a33"; logging-data="3431"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19J7WImK1bMxEkKFHzOOPqb8/gagR4DXec=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:CV7HnXFwHFNJ/ttL+5CFHkcvWsg= sha1:PciaW/ICpmitkup6GxXxZmjQxt4= Content-Type: text/plain Date: 2013-02-17T11:47:11+00:00 List-Id: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" writes: > As Randy said the problem with pools when used for management the life > cycle of objects is finalization of controlled objects. If subpools > alleviate this problem is to be seen. What Randy said was that the _hand-written_ subpool implementations the ARG had seen had problems with finalizable objects. Of coaurse, in the end all implementations are hand-written by somebody.