From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GNAT and user-defined aspects and pragmas?
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:14:51 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <lyd1vgkct0.fsf@pushface.org>
References: <87h9ku2dcp.fsf@adaheads.sparre-andersen.dk>
	<avh44b101hm5erus5s1tssc6ef7tj2g1qn@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="29a2b57997615acde1fccc73c72adb9b";
	logging-data="22750"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+J1xhMu4VA2KSMgtvi0jgsnmkRYobwV3w="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:f6KBuRY38CONwwvjEhTEJOkxi7Y=
	sha1:XHW7d7IiAHcvWFWQLzwEs+Rf8So=
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:28296
Date: 2015-11-11T11:14:51+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> writes:

> 	From the beginning (back in the days of mil-std 1815) pragmas
> were, loosely, suggestions to the compiler -- they were not supposed
> to have any effect on the correctness of a program (for example,
> Inline -- the program should produce the same final result when
> executed whether a function was inlined or not).

Import? Export? (OK, Ada95)