From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: HTTP with Simple Components: Status.Kind always File Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 08:06:42 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <2017071720305687401-contact@flyx.org> <2017071918093536089-contact@flyx.org> <2017071923134489971-contact@flyx.org> <2017072015354641511-contact@flyx.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="4f96c703ed4e94a5953f04a79d6c9f15"; logging-data="26274"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19LA0sg2jQHOE24fZ9EVLvyEeAw5RWNLS8=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:+6Y2/W9SYJ3IaVa3xS0F+Q2/lQo= sha1:u6dktFK0QaKLgGSo6+Mcns1ophI= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:47482 Date: 2017-07-21T08:06:42+01:00 List-Id: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" writes: >> The RFC that Dmitri quotes is for URIs. You want the one that defines >> the HTTP protocol, currently RFC7230 - see section 3, Message Format. >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7230#section-3 > > So, is it OK to always recognize query part in the path. Correct? > > What is the scheme by default? http? None? See https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7230#section-5.3.1 : For example, a client wishing to retrieve a representation of the resource identified as http://www.example.org/where?q=now directly from the origin server would open (or reuse) a TCP connection to port 80 of the host "www.example.org" and send the lines: GET /where?q=now HTTP/1.1 Host: www.example.org followed by the remainder of the request message.