From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Intermixing two tagged types
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 08:58:39 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <lybnrnlcy8.fsf@pushface.org>
References: <lsgi0c$q2j$1@speranza.aioe.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="b814ca014269fd1fa21bc4c05b94dd9e";
	logging-data="8796"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19+cJ+BDgKWL+uUDEiQ6JBwOBQ0H/7XqIA="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:dk0jmBNawifmd68fKzDueBkKJPU=
	sha1:/fRBVOV+tN82cFvOrh7vpZDfnco=
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:21747
Date: 2014-08-14T08:58:39+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru> writes:

> So (now in Ada terms, which I am implementing) a function can belong
> to two tagged types.

Are you sure that it's appropriate to use *tagged* types? And even if if
is appropriate for raptor_namespace (i.e., you derive new types from
it), is it so for raptor_namespace_stack? - which clearly is a stack of
raptor_namespace (or possibly raptor_namespace'Class).