From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Needed - Ada 2012 Compiler.
Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 20:32:23 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <lyblzlm4zc.fsf@pushface.org>
References: <5c6d8e37-b737-4a8b-b601-0d0b4c10756b@googlegroups.com>
	<ff343399-8c00-467e-997c-0c6fb87f807a@googlegroups.com>
	<qcgpro$lmi$1@dont-email.me>
	<29e20858-6e53-4e52-a5e0-6ff7cb0d8f74@googlegroups.com>
	<f627b458-8155-43b1-8220-8524e801d389@googlegroups.com>
	<1f5a3876-a27a-439a-bcf8-d24d96e437a4@googlegroups.com>
	<d1ba037d-d355-45c9-a4f5-e51b65c0613e@googlegroups.com>
	<6b285165-962a-4bde-ae3a-87c72003a08f@googlegroups.com>
	<qcm854$1dq$1@dont-email.me>
	<72cd2636-75dc-4aef-9636-0230c78e287c@googlegroups.com>
	<qcmenm$7r0$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="15d556a1fad4768d627f44cbfde961cd";
	logging-data="30846"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/ifr4OoLrakh3D3syK/gXEuW3JRoHVsSY="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:APZgeqwfoGhJJDN/3bhS//AOhrY=
	sha1:yizNk+xtG85BOmYI+UYl1GmJzdE=
Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:56403
Date: 2019-05-29T20:32:23+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Björn Lundin <b.f.lundin@gmail.com> writes:

> Yes, and I say that the OP's source code will get GPL'd when he link
> and sell it with CE. _Not before_. So he can select to sell source
> only, with _any_ license.

A bit misleading. OP's source code can have any licence they like, no
matter what compilation suite they use during development. But if it is
to form part of a commercial distribution including GPL'd code, OP's
licence has to be compatible[1] with GPL and the distribution itself has
to be made under the GPL.

[1] https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html#GPLCompatibleLicenses