From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada202X: Easy to use "UML private"-like components
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 17:12:17 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <lya9luwg0u.fsf@pushface.org>
References: <69246de0-4b33-4d47-b5be-a45e8c911fb0@googlegroups.com>
	<wccwqpnux8n.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
	<eabcaba2-a5aa-499d-a179-917f5dde79f3@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="c8504a89c76ea11bda6664e6198ae3cd";
	logging-data="5829"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/r4AsxjgHZFvByqRTsQTz+pL3493ZXAd0="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:9BLd3VwSmwR3+JXviopeQdTGQTE=
	sha1:RYQMdNXVal6w9t/tBfO3rE9Z37c=
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:16269
Date: 2013-07-10T17:12:17+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Martin <martin@thedowies.com> writes:

> There are current options of how to achieve UML-like private-ness but
> all are clunky and some are horrific and, given their access-types not
> available for safety-critical systems (where coding standard still
> often forbid such usage).

If you were doing full translation you could implement UML private vs
protected at the translation stage.