From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 border1.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!backlog3.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Safety of unprotected concurrent operations on constant objects
Date: Sun, 04 May 2014 20:36:25 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <ly7g618hfq.fsf@pushface.org>
References: <slrnlm6mkg.i0l.lithiumcat@nat.rebma.instinctive.eu>
 <7403d130-8b42-43cd-a0f1-53ba34b46141@googlegroups.com>
 <slrnlmals8.i0l.lithiumcat@nat.rebma.instinctive.eu>
 <lya9aybkxc.fsf@pushface.org> <lk41jr$1vl$1@dont-email.me>
 <slrnlmbs1n.i0l.lithiumcat@nat.rebma.instinctive.eu>
 <lk62fl$pr8$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="6c8e46900abaabd1a3b7c03d9ac850ff";
 logging-data="12624"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
 posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/y4ZV+540zWy0M/yZ1Q6boYtjiQHDDhTU="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:hqP6nicu9Du4BHrHMtpUPbjftuo=
 sha1:FJ8UptnSyCHbyCc5jmQjjxXFM3g=
X-Original-Bytes: 1623
Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:186218
Date: 2014-05-04T20:36:25+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Jeffrey Carter <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.not.acm.org> writes:

> And since you have the source to GNAT's ordered map package, you can
> look at it and see that this specific implementation is not task safe.

I had a look at it following this thread, and I have to say it's quite
challenging. Could do with some architectural documentation, I think!