From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: access-to-classwide has non-static size?
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 08:53:09 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <ly7fu2lt3e.fsf@pushface.org>
References: <lyk2y2luc6.fsf@pushface.org> <mf35bj$jt0$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="e362043f1eec5b72fb571caf32708303";
	logging-data="21024"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19oyWlclNHEhTg8namwBPG0630NXtnoT0U="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:bCmymvYZDcQ9Kcd9ZOAZBF3lmjs=
	sha1:ZiAa2i3UQdgIkbrjOAKTNdCvIM4=
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:25282
Date: 2015-03-27T08:53:09+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"J-P. Rosen" <rosen@adalog.fr> writes:

> Le 27/03/2015 09:26, Simon Wright a écrit :
>>    protected type Dispatchable_Events is
>>       ...
>>    private
>>       ...
>>       The_Events : Event_Queues.Vector (Capacity => Capacity);
>> 
>> and when compiling with the Ravenscar profile (GNAT GPL 2014, GCC 4.9.1,
>> GCC 5.0.0 20150208) the compiler says
>> 
>>    warning: component has non-static size
>>    warning: creation of protected object of type "Dispatchable_Events"
>>     will violate restriction No_Implicit_Heap_Allocations
>> 
>> Is this (the non-static size part!) right?
>
> It's not the component of the Vector (Event_P) which is non static,
> it's the component of the PO (i.e. The_Events).

Thanks, J-P. I need to do the allocation explicitly, then. I was hoping
to be able to do it at elaboration.