From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Surprising behaviour of strings.fixed.overwrite Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 12:40:37 +0000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="ff529209d97605a4e00265a5af81ac3e"; logging-data="16944"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/AcuASkJ583Seg3RYOCGmIWpsFe3og18Q=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:HPdif+4GSUg5BqCbfl+rQcoLLTE= sha1:6EGFBiL8tnZF83/+j0JzYRiALwQ= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:23231 Date: 2014-11-13T12:40:37+00:00 List-Id: Markus Schöpflin writes: > But by now I think I'm better off creating my own set of functions and > procedures which just do what I need, as it turns out that the > standard implementation is rather slow, anyway. No issue with creating your own subprograms, but GNAT's implementation isn't the standard (the Standard contains no implementation, after all).