From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Intervention needed? Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2019 17:16:37 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="3352be630da3ad5d12c90afaa3beb70a"; logging-data="22773"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX199sm3gW5WIzsxMTN20LJoxmbe/s8yAKFE=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:98Nv5F0lb3zalTViqkoEwO0+Ws0= sha1:ya3RYqoQqylwcQZMWuK16O5nOE4= Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:56060 Date: 2019-04-03T17:16:37+01:00 List-Id: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" writes: >> Which feature(s) [that other debuggers have] do you think are >> missing from GDB when debugging Ada? > > Other debuggers work, GDB does not. If you have an Ada project of a > moderate size GDB stops working. How big is "moderate"?