From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,fd4fc3d2b22df500
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Received: by 10.180.93.134 with SMTP id cu6mr2462441wib.5.1357876442976;
        Thu, 10 Jan 2013 19:54:02 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 o9ni5955wio.1!nntp.google.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!82.197.223.108.MISMATCH!feeder2.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!85.12.40.130.MISMATCH!xlned.com!feeder1.xlned.com!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nrc-news.nrc.ca!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: On Style: Any opinions on *not* capitalising the first letter of
 verbs in a procedure name ?
Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 18:19:01 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <ly4nivwl0q.fsf@pushface.org>
References: <ebe4dd4a-3473-4d3f-9cbd-72e1d5805ae8@googlegroups.com>
	<lybod4x0h3.fsf@pushface.org> <85623bsosa.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="585248293da7adcafb924c79c19cf5ec";
	logging-data="19379"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/X64Rh/sFzAUKWWGU/xzXWLV2WS11eFyc="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:2Iw7DLwN1ORNRNkxWtcFfWUvoeY=
	sha1:1fUTcHB/hELrFpe/HoQyZGKLpYc=
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: 2013-01-05T18:19:01+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org> writes:

> Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org> writes:
>
>> Rod Kay <rodakay@internode.on.net> writes:
>>
>>> The idea is to only capitalise the noun parts of the procedure
>>> name. It's a minor thing I guess, yet I find code a little easier to
>>> read when used.
>>
>> I like my IDE (Emacs) to capitalise for me, and this would need so
>> many case exceptions that it'd become impractical.
>
> Unless you add a dictionary of verbs/nouns. Maybe automated lookup
> into the on-line OED - do they have an API? A lot of work for very
> little gain! But it would be cool if it worked :)

:-)

> Which reminds me; we need a simpler keybinding for "make this word a
> case exception".

C-c C-y is simple enough. I agree that C-c C-M-y is a bit complex
(though inherited from 4.01): perhaps C-c M-y ?