From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,461d464a39a7a30a
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8
X-Received: by 10.224.59.205 with SMTP id m13mr22759015qah.7.1367665343468;
        Sat, 04 May 2013 04:02:23 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 y6ni7356qax.0!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed.news.ucla.edu!nrc-news.nrc.ca!News.Dal.Ca!news.litech.org!news2.arglkargh.de!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx05.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GNAT not generating any code for =?utf-8?Q?sub=E2=80=91progra?=
 =?utf-8?Q?m=3A?= known bug?
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 21:43:00 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <ly4neqs7xn.fsf@pushface.org>
References: <op.wv7w02pwule2fv@cardamome> <op.wv70f3m3ule2fv@cardamome>
	<lyhairrus0.fsf@pushface.org> <op.wv9ilgizule2fv@cardamome>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="abea7aea1fa87bdeaf110ddb7626f1db";
	logging-data="32380"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/HvekXPfA3yqT7Oe5ukswzv/y0SgmPJ7s="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:sm2wCNn9ElNVtlcL/v3GUGDMCnU=
	sha1:Fk9yqYblV/SHXjaHdTxHGCwehuE=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: 2013-04-28T21:43:00+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)" <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr> writes:

> Side note: with the `type Low_High is array (Half) of
> Interfaces.Unsigned_32;` in your snippet, shouldn't you specify the
> array should be packed? Or may be that's already implied by the
> component type... will have to check the RM.

It never occurred to me that it wouldn't be ... of course I'd get a GNAT
warning if the size of Low_High wasn't the size of a Time (64).