From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Example question Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 15:42:07 +0000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <0fbd755d-7bcf-42b1-a20b-c6a2c74c7d6e@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="71797db6fbf0039ebda7a9c799ddb33f"; logging-data="21418"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18R0c2PL5uLYvgmip1cHzG5l3MtJmXZuDQ=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:jXd8IPnHPyvjBeVcArYmixgYTjc= sha1:aq10ZjLQODFVYDn/t5cJXzwjwOk= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:22758 Date: 2014-10-26T15:42:07+00:00 List-Id: Shark8 writes: > It means that if it enters the SELECT and there are already tasks > waiting at the rendezvous for both entry-points then one will be > chosen "at random". (Though I heard that some compilers /did/ have a > deterministic behavior here.) Very probably: but a different compiler may very well have a different behaviour.