From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: What exactly is the licensing situation with GNAT? Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 07:38:50 +0000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <87fvdr2vdv.fsf@adaheads.sparre-andersen.dk> <54609F34.4080201@spam.spam> <35f01472-3510-4f67-8765-006fa8591c35@googlegroups.com> <9tc8w.73007$ZT5.37595@fx07.iad> <22a3816a-4e89-48f0-a126-dce581781beb@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="ff529209d97605a4e00265a5af81ac3e"; logging-data="9180"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+DcFUZq0BDUjKJ3lQE7xx6kR4LRPDkcxY=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:ZPZWa9gEL8QM/0ar7LCVVdsehtY= sha1:ToO1ubYG6O3Q5V20jagsJ1MDFLc= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:23137 Date: 2014-11-12T07:38:50+00:00 List-Id: David Botton writes: > It is certainly a question if it would hold in truth legally, but > basically even with no runtime they would claim your resulting > executable is GPL. What would you have copied? It's the *runtime* that has had the *runtime* exception rmoved from it.