From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Dynamic allocation in the predefined language environment Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2015 22:35:01 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <559a623d$0$293$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <873811cre5.fsf@theworld.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="c762050aff3a30866fa7e79999b14776"; logging-data="29838"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+fWKB6jSXI/IdSDq+qOhC7XXn3U0UiXNQ=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Wkcf5uYmESMNwVGfkaDK6DVbOUU= sha1:zRtsMZgzAUuRzq9ja3g/g5tcNRM= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:26667 Date: 2015-07-06T22:35:01+01:00 List-Id: "Randy Brukardt" writes: > "Simon Wright" wrote in message > news:lytwthxq1t.fsf@pushface.org... >> Bob Duff writes: >> >>> Yes, the predefined containers packages unfortunately don't allow you >>> to specify the storage pool. >> >> An advantage of the Booch Components! > > Which works because there is only a single implementation of both the > specs and bodies. If you don't specify the contents of the bodies, > specifying the storage pool is nearly useless (the main use would be > to use some sort of debugging pool), as the only pool implementations > would have the same properties as the global default storage pool. Come to think, the time we used this was as the storage pool for fixed-size objects, pointers to which were held in a bounded container.