From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada Successor Language
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 08:13:40 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <ly4lhyj5gb.fsf@pushface.org>
References: <5e86db65-84b9-4b5b-9aea-427a658b5ae7@googlegroups.com>
	<878t7u1cfm.fsf@nightsong.com>
	<c22391d4-94b6-4ed3-96c0-1e9a84c4a99c@googlegroups.com>
	<b1141508-e692-46f6-b536-4a72081dfb45@googlegroups.com>
	<foqeocF7l4fU1@mid.individual.net> <pg949k$jmv$1@dont-email.me>
	<foqjvhF8kskU1@mid.individual.net>
	<776f3645-ed0c-4118-9b4d-21660e3bba4b@googlegroups.com>
	<pg9bd9$eo9$1@gioia.aioe.org> <87602fbu2g.fsf@nightsong.com>
	<pgad3n$1sop$1@gioia.aioe.org> <87po0mziqt.fsf@nightsong.com>
	<pgbm5e$c1l$1@gioia.aioe.org> <87fu1izfgs.fsf@nightsong.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="8d7bfa9f041d2de123dc82c259371544";
	logging-data="17686"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/f0Cl3VrMfELiLgbk49hRMdeBUOeRaILg="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:s5Ao6KoboYCAl5T0G1J05Az+mjI=
	sha1:isAZMiBjl60mtSW9lljBO7Gl9WE=
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:53188
Date: 2018-06-20T08:13:40+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> writes:

> Oh hmm, ok, that's interesting.  But I'm surprised that the LRM is
> loose enough to allow two observably different implementations like
> that.

"observably"? how? code size of the generic will change, not sure that
overall code size will, & anyway who cares?