From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Aggregate GPRs Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2015 18:23:59 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="0903b4fccd19524a858dd481bbd547d7"; logging-data="22154"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+X4xtmkQNaZxbD3TMPVlYCk6kKfcx8nhI=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:f9oZGlgPs5u9Lt+fZQUYsVXjlNM= sha1:wnK27C9yj+1gyjGlJoFA/IMI2Dk= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:27642 Date: 2015-08-30T18:23:59+01:00 List-Id: I see from the documentation[1] that, for projects built through the aggregate project, package Builder is ignored (even if the aggregate project doesn't have a package Builder?). I've just found (with GPRBUILD GPL 2015) that the attributes Target and Runtime are also ignored! These features seem to me to reduce the usefulness of aggregate projects to the point of uselessness. Does anyone have positive experiences with them? [1] http://docs.adacore.com/gprbuild-docs/html/share/gnat_project_manager.html#package-builder-in-aggregate-projects