From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT-FSF for Windows? Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 13:32:48 +0000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <1f85f005-a42f-4620-ac09-8b5dd1a37b1b@googlegroups.com> <8738a5z3ql.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="e614caa3bbcdcdac946afd88f128a08d"; logging-data="7992"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+GoK5jkXlSHVZgStT2y9YVYBYAwFO/4rI=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Cc2646Mx1SjvT83vV3iZgFMorjI= sha1:RLgMferfSfh1u3R7ya+qpFl5RYs= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:22949 Date: 2014-10-31T13:32:48+00:00 List-Id: Jeremiah writes: > On a side note (But related in that it is part of the choice to use > FSF vs other options), is the copyright/license statement required in > all files generated for FSF licensed source/binaries or is it just an > option? I don't know what "all files generated for" means. Did you mean "from"? in which case the answer has to be "no". But re: "required in all files", "How to use GNU licenses for your own software"[1] is relevant: "Whichever license you plan to use, the process involves adding two elements to each source file of your program: a copyright notice (such as "Copyright 1999 Terry Jones"), and a statement of copying permission, saying that the program is distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License (or the Lesser GPL)." [1] http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.html