From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Strict aliasing, is it OK? Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2017 10:49:32 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="1fd775f133d24a665d85179a3c87631c"; logging-data="31657"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18TeGht7ziBhEMBHqxmvClbfdyJZ/0XKXA=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:UKQGeIDFWcgNsiR5PEv0ZNBzk8Q= sha1:sqcVWBJkxRsYHwIyPKCxmue52js= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:47298 Date: 2017-07-05T10:49:32+01:00 List-Id: Victor Porton writes: > By the way, > > type Syntax_Description_Type is access constant Syntax_Description_Record > with Convention => C; > > This isn't `access constant RDF.Auxiliary.Dummy_Record` but is memory > compatible with it. Well, the conventions are different.