From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT proposal: note on implicit exceptions insertion Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2019 18:08:04 +0000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <21f5f1ca-eabe-4ce6-9ee0-5d308d7676ff@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="22bfe39bbd4ccdb1e7240d5098a44885"; logging-data="23204"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX182qPTUCRUH3nxhi6T1spCgKP3x/npFAqE=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:tDfQlF2esjEmveL9SIvopuG5VJg= sha1:e3lW3YrhS821wwUEhaB9jvsHQJI= Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:55483 Date: 2019-02-10T18:08:04+00:00 List-Id: Jesper Quorning writes: > What is Your opinion on a switch for gnatmake that notes the > programmer when a implicit excepton is inserted. I think it should > work somewhat like -gnaty just making a note. > > program.adb:99: (note) Implicit Constraint_Error infered Don't you already get a warning if a CE is going to be raised at runtime?