From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,2925b133078d1557 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Erik Magnuson Subject: Re: Flexible Strings (was Equality operator...) Date: 1997/05/12 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 241075784 Sender: erik@sulu.fl.ensco.com X-Nntp-Posting-Host: 204.240.41.183 References: <9704301422.AA07755@most> <3F2AA8DEC61418AE.502E81A8ECA1C4E7.3A25DE2FB38755A4@library-proxy.airnews.net> <3374220A.74D0@sprintmail.com> Organization: ENSCO, INC. Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-05-12T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: "John G. Volan" writes: > Erik Magnuson wrote: > > reclamation for Unchecked_Conversion, i.e., UC simply set the pointer to > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^ > Unchecked_Deallocation UD > > Well, we knew what you meant to say. Thanks. Somehow the threads on "no code for Unchecked_Conversion" and this one collided in my local namespace... (Would I have made the same mistake if the routines were called Conversion_Unchecked and Deallocation_Unchecked ;-) -- Erik