From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Georg Bauhaus Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada vs SQLite3 benchmark Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 09:56:15 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <10k8o95prdhuj$.195flbmen5kex.dlg@40tude.net> <122qvkxwx9207$.x2ietmtp83wg$.dlg@40tude.net> Reply-To: nonlegitur@futureapps.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 07:56:16 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="b96887e80893c84a90c3007226ca0d1c"; logging-data="3254"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX199DRsoxRkur75DkHdK9RhxsQhxABMGrxM=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 In-Reply-To: <122qvkxwx9207$.x2ietmtp83wg$.dlg@40tude.net> Cancel-Lock: sha1:KewiVR4mDfaZEknrLvcV+d9MAzQ= Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:189041 Date: 2014-09-18T09:56:15+02:00 List-Id: On 18.09.14 09:27, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > Let us consider the use case when everything fits into the memory. Why not > to use plain containers then? The operations needed by the application program are what can set STL style containers apart from relational databases. Whenever the operations do not call for the latter, I, too, don't see a use case for an RDBMS in a small embedded system. So, do people use SQLite3 as a hash table of records?