From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Jeffrey Carter Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada vs SQLite3 benchmark Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 17:16:35 -0700 Organization: Also freenews.netfront.net; news.tornevall.net; news.eternal-september.org Message-ID: References: <10k8o95prdhuj$.195flbmen5kex.dlg@40tude.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 00:16:37 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="5b4eadb0ecf28f7f740a0e18f3715b8f"; logging-data="23167"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18S5nbN+tbprZRfhmRjSZG+fxwX0IZBJ3Y=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.0 In-Reply-To: <10k8o95prdhuj$.195flbmen5kex.dlg@40tude.net> Cancel-Lock: sha1:YDJPSjcEqJcKNSoG5kPCPOgZRO8= Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:189035 Date: 2014-09-17T17:16:35-07:00 List-Id: On 09/17/2014 09:51 AM, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > I posted benchmark of Ada persistent B-tree vs. SQLite3 at Ada Programming > blog: > > http://ada-programming.blogspot.de/2014/09 > > The implementation of B-tree is based on Ada.Direct_IO with a transaction > layer, e.g. for safety against system failure. Is your B-tree/Direct_IO version task safe? Is your version of SQLite compiled to be thread safe? -- Jeff Carter "Perfidious English mouse-dropping hoarders." Monty Python & the Holy Grail 10