From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,7d3cb5920e882220 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!feed.xsnews.nl!border-1.ams.xsnews.nl!feeder1.cambrium.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!193.141.40.65.MISMATCH!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!npeer-ng1.kpn.DE!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Subject: Re: Contracted exceptions for Ada Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de Organization: cbb software GmbH References: <5947aa62-2547-4fbb-bc46-1111b4a0dcc9@x69g2000hsx.googlegroups.com> <7m9wkymyi5h7.1235e72is9mp9.dlg@40tude.net> <1355376.ahPdGlRDJW@linux1.krischik.com> <1bvj0n3ana6zj.1b1q7na2q2i0a.dlg@40tude.net> <5tw4p3ydoalt$.eyhp82hd04ch.dlg@40tude.net> <1vc7xfiouucfe.14549yzryw44i$.dlg@40tude.net> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:20:32 +0100 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Date: 12 Dec 2007 11:12:47 CET NNTP-Posting-Host: 8a4d1e82.newsspool4.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=PiQe405Rl2ieoCI^f\Y]Ea4IUKkgbMcmnhRn34 On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 20:50:07 +0000, Simon Wright wrote: > "Dmitry A. Kazakov" writes: > >> On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 20:25:34 +0000, Simon Wright wrote: >> >>> The Ariane IV system engineers said to themselves, and probably in >>> the design documentation, "The maximum horizontal velocity is >>> X. Therefore the conversion to the fixed-point type _Whatever_ >>> cannot overflow. Therefore we do not need to handle exceptions for >>> this conversion, so (given we are short of CPU power) we will not >>> do any extra processing to avoid exceptions." >>> >>> Not sure they would have recognised "contract" in that context. >> >> Yes, my premise was that the type of H_Input changed from Ariane IV >> to Ariane V. In this case translation of the conversion function >> H_Input_To_Whatever could refute the second "therefore" because X >> would not be the maximal possible value of H_Input anymore. > > X was *never* the maximum possible value of H_Input! In that case with contracted exceptions, the code without an exception handler were illegal from the beginning. -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de