From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newspeer1.nac.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Georg Bauhaus Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Is there a way to do large block of source code comments Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 19:48:05 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <8fd27434-43c2-4bd1-b72b-dd7a0ef5af75@googlegroups.com> <4407fc6e-a3a6-47d6-8f49-a5a0a1e8e0c4@googlegroups.com> <1409734659.7121.231.camel@obry.net> <1409759532.7121.252.camel@obry.net> Reply-To: nonlegitur@futureapps.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 17:48:05 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="a631f4a085ededc0f5b0769b7fe21a52"; logging-data="13589"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/aKCTV+nRS+KrSakojtzkNEVHzQVRCqEc=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 In-Reply-To: <1409759532.7121.252.camel@obry.net> Cancel-Lock: sha1:HhDMJXYXP4/a+L1JwYKzIzOO5oE= Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:188837 Date: 2014-09-03T19:48:05+02:00 List-Id: On 03.09.14 17:52, Pascal Obry wrote: > Parsing a comment section???? Strange idea, I doubt this is reasonable. It is standard practice in original SPARK, Java, and eLisp to parse "comment sections". Also, languages such as Python and Ruby parse commenting strings, similar to format strings. They know the value of giving comments language status.