From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "G.B." <bauhaus@futureapps.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: STM32F4 Discovery, communication and libraries
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 15:04:40 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <lu4f96$kjt$1@dont-email.me>
References: <60a42dc6-d8d0-4432-ae5a-86de18b82840@googlegroups.com>
 <5kkrv9hejn2qhdckkeo8lidkbh3bkme1gn@4ax.com>
 <5b91313c-acf9-4a6e-b157-6ba7c8021567@googlegroups.com>
 <ru1tv9p9g8gtd7aijug3j2eojdpdgvhihk@4ax.com>
 <0513ad07-6fbe-463a-be6f-097cd5113f52@googlegroups.com>
 <e8yq8rtj1pcm$.glzqqjd7ulsi.dlg@40tude.net>
 <4f1ec65a-d66a-40bf-a0d6-278fde206e70@googlegroups.com>
 <uxgn4sadwori$.7fnns7uw9q79$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <c69kifFfr6sU1@mid.individual.net>
 <1cjwzr30b24xy.11kpydntxhfo5$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <c6bo5nF23tiU1@mid.individual.net>
 <1xrcksk78afho$.xz6vgakq9o4t.dlg@40tude.net>
 <c6h8ieFfss4U1@mid.individual.net>
 <wq3x8ean0f5z$.em02okqv4iv8$.dlg@40tude.net> <lu29ve$lq5$1@dont-email.me>
 <1cbqqpx46gpl4$.ggt9magmgptm$.dlg@40tude.net>
Reply-To: nonlegitur@futureapps.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 13:04:38 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="b96887e80893c84a90c3007226ca0d1c";
 logging-data="21117"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
 posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18c+AbwSy6BATj8Z8DIjc2wUl/WCVWWdb8="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
In-Reply-To: <1cbqqpx46gpl4$.ggt9magmgptm$.dlg@40tude.net>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:GLzW7BSRQlhHxTEp0U+dE2Sfhkk=
Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:188799
Date: 2014-09-02T15:04:40+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 02.09.14 10:21, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:

>> Will a small board made for the ubiquitous, penniless underlings
>> working in cost-optimized production warrant a full Ada run-time?
>
> Why not? Full Ada 83 ran on 2MB mini VAX, if I correctly remember.

RAM on STM32 F4 is not measured in MB or higher, AFAICT, but in KB.

>> Why, if systems are not meant to be flexible?
>> And what will be its overhead?

 > The overhead will be maintenance of board revisions.

I thought you were talking about overheads measured in
protected actions per event and similar.