From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ac39a12d5faf5b14
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-04-13 17:00:41 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!out.nntp.be!propagator-SanJose!in.nntp.be!news-in-sanjose!newsfeed.onecall.net!chcgil2-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!news.binc.net!kilgallen
From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Development process in the Ada community
Date: 13 Apr 2002 19:00:30 -0500
Organization: LJK Software
Message-ID: <lu0EUqx3K0dG@eisner.encompasserve.org>
References: <3CB46975.90408@snafu.de> <3CB7E244.4090105@snafu.de>
 <2dWMkL$GpNnq@eisner.encompasserve.org> <3CB85658.5050406@snafu.de>
 <8YmWznELCFXQ@eisner.encompasserve.org>
 <ee2c9a2989167c1c5ce5b90239a3d41a.48257@mygate.mailgate.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org
X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1018742434 26137 192.135.80.34 (14 Apr 2002
 00:00:34 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 00:00:34 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:22495
Date: 2002-04-13T19:00:30-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <ee2c9a2989167c1c5ce5b90239a3d41a.48257@mygate.mailgate.org>, "Kent Paul Dolan" <xanthian@well.com> writes:
> "Larry Kilgallen" <Kilgallen@SpamCop.net> wrote:
> 
>> Is it ISO document charges that you are complaining about ?
> 
> They are certainly worth a complaint.  The daunting cost of paper
> standards, and the standards process funding mechanism that prevents
> most of the standards from becoming freely downloadable softcopy,
> arguably are active deterents to widespread use, or even awareness, of
> standards.

Again, I ask, what does this have to do with Ada95 ?