From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newspeer1.nac.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!news.stack.nl!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Simon Clubley Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: [OT] Ravenscar (the place, not profile), was: Re: STM32F4 Discovery, communication and libraries Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2014 11:25:26 +0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <60a42dc6-d8d0-4432-ae5a-86de18b82840@googlegroups.com> <5kkrv9hejn2qhdckkeo8lidkbh3bkme1gn@4ax.com> <5b91313c-acf9-4a6e-b157-6ba7c8021567@googlegroups.com> <0513ad07-6fbe-463a-be6f-097cd5113f52@googlegroups.com> <4f1ec65a-d66a-40bf-a0d6-278fde206e70@googlegroups.com> <1cd027f2-a0e0-4206-b989-4aed2090cde8@googlegroups.com> <1ibla8yyj3ibm$.1lz0cmeu8ptp2.dlg@40tude.net> Injection-Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2014 11:25:26 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="e458ff8b81bc0c159989eb0e36c6e372"; logging-data="1710"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19WEsc32XFoBib4YbTIAsjIO2a1m9kJvh4=" User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (VMS/Multinet) Cancel-Lock: sha1:hPan2NndkmOmsHMPiTQT3x6ghdU= Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:188757 Date: 2014-08-30T11:25:26+00:00 List-Id: On 2014-08-29, Randy Brukardt wrote: > "Simon Clubley" wrote in > message news:ltqbhn$t94$1@dont-email.me... >> I have got to ask: how did Ravenscar ever get chosen for an Ada meeting >> place ? >> >> I can understand a place like (say) York, or another university town/city, >> but of all the places on the planet, how did a little coastal "town >> that never was" ever get chosen for an Ada meeting ? > > I don't have any knowledge of how IRTAW picks it's meeting sites, but they > do seem to pick smaller places for their meetings. I presume it was close to > whoever was organizing it (probably someone from York). > That makes more sense if it was something organised by someone living in Yorkshire. I had gained the impression it was something organised by someone more distant like yourself. Still, there's lots of other nice places in Yorkshire it _could_ have been held (I've walked through a good number of them :-)) so this location was obviously of personal interest to someone. Thanks for the above info, Randy. Simon. -- Simon Clubley, clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP Microsoft: Bringing you 1980s technology to a 21st century world