From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Victor Porton Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Conflicting interfaces Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 04:21:56 +0300 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: AnnUDmZwVERVUXyHDyOl5A.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: KNode/4.13.3 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:21845 Date: 2014-08-20T04:21:56+03:00 List-Id: What to do if two interfaces (possibly by different vendors) incidentally have a method with the same name and the same signature? For this situation we probably should (in Ada 202X) introduce some "renaming" facility for interface methods. Or is it already in Ada 2012? I think that no. -- Victor Porton - http://portonvictor.org