From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Intermixing two tagged types
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 14:57:18 +0300
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <lsi86s$hqg$1@speranza.aioe.org>
References: <lsgi0c$q2j$1@speranza.aioe.org> <lybnrnlcy8.fsf@pushface.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: AnnUDmZwVERVUXyHDyOl5A.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: KNode/4.12.4
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:21751
Date: 2014-08-14T14:57:18+03:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Simon Wright wrote:

> Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru> writes:
> 
>> So (now in Ada terms, which I am implementing) a function can belong
>> to two tagged types.
> 
> Are you sure that it's appropriate to use *tagged* types? And even if if
> is appropriate for raptor_namespace (i.e., you derive new types from
> it), is it so for raptor_namespace_stack? - which clearly is a stack of
> raptor_namespace (or possibly raptor_namespace'Class).

Tagged types a little decrease efficiency, but I use tagged types anyway 
(primarily for controlled finalization).

-- 
Victor Porton - http://portonvictor.org