From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Trouble with "operation can be dispatching in only one type"
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 22:23:44 +0300
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <lsgdvt$g4h$1@speranza.aioe.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: AnnUDmZwVERVUXyHDyOl5A.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: KNode/4.12.4
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:21729
Date: 2014-08-13T22:23:44+03:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

I defined two tagged types T1 and T2 in some package.

I need a function in the same package:

not overriding function F (Stack: T1) return T2;

The compiler complaints:

operation can be dispatching in only one type

My current workaround is to define it instead as:

not overriding function F (Stack: T1'Class) return T2;

But this is a hack. Can I define this function in the right way? (I want it 
to be dispatching only in T1, not T2.)

-- 
Victor Porton - http://portonvictor.org