From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Jeffrey Carter Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: What is more efficient: a container or a manual programming? Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2014 12:46:14 -0700 Organization: Also freenews.netfront.net; news.tornevall.net; news.eternal-september.org Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2014 19:46:16 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="a0c81a81d1281113b3831cf0c04e791a"; logging-data="28329"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19XR8DhqmukzQKh2Slsi6dBEBqmB6X73FE=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:u+/JNRbjNodhJzmzma02ZisCu4c= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:21629 Date: 2014-08-09T12:46:14-07:00 List-Id: On 08/09/2014 11:03 AM, Victor Porton wrote: > >> What is more efficient: Rec or Cont? >> >> type Rec new Limited_Controlled with >> record >> Str: access String; >> end record; >> >> -- >> -- Code to automatically deallocate Str when Rec is finalized >> -- >> >> or > > type Cont is new Containers.Indefinite_Holders(String); Cont, because it makes more efficient use of the developer(s). Anything else is only an issue if using Cont is preventing the system from meeting its timing requirements. -- Jeff Carter "I fart in your general direction." Monty Python & the Holy Grail 05