From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Victor Porton Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Unchecked_Union record inside an other record - trouble Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 23:12:07 +0300 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: AnnUDmZwVERVUXyHDyOl5A.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: KNode/4.12.4 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:21577 Date: 2014-08-08T23:12:07+03:00 List-Id: Shark8 wrote: > On 08-Aug-14 13:56, Victor Porton wrote: >> For records interfacing with C it SHOULD be ignored completely. Because >> it is C. > > Not in your example; the subcomponent is part of a record which is *not* > a C-style union, it should therefore store the proper tag value > (discriminant) in its own discriminant. > > type T2(K: Kind) is > record > Z: int; > Ob: T(K); > end record > with Convention=>C; > > Yields: > warning: variant record has no direct equivalent in C > warning: use of convention for type "T2" is dubious > So, remove Convention => C. You forgot "with Unchecked_Union". Certainly your code does not work. -- Victor Porton - http://portonvictor.org